A healthy dose of reality, with no superstition, and absolutely . . .

No Bull Banner

Making science and critical thinking so simple you can understand and so interesting you'll want to learn.

Return to Home Page

Donations

Some visitors to this site have asked how they can donate money to No Bull to help us pay expenses. The simplest way is to click the PayPal "Donate" button below and use a debit or credit card. We very much appreciate your contributions to No Bull.

Because of our activist nature, gifts to No Bull are not tax deductible; and we hate that as much as you do. For more information, see our Terms Page.

Free Gift

.

On the Origin of Species

by Charles Darwin

I have Charles Darwin's seminal book, On the Origin of Species, in PDF format, compatible with virtually every kind of computer. Give me your first name and email address, and I'll send you a link to a FREE, downloadable copy. You may read it on your own computer screen, print it, or even let your computer read it to you aloud for your pleasure and education. It's a fascinating book.

In addition, I'll send you a short email every month or two -- or less -- when I make significant changes or additions to the No Bull Website. Click here for your gifts.

Free Gift

I'll never share your name or email address, and you can easily stop the Updates any time you choose.


Table of Contents

Click the down arrow to make your selection.

The items in this Table of Contents are divided into categories, but there is a lot of overlap in some cases. For this reason, a few articles may be listed in two or more areas.

Do Not Copy

This file is presented courtesy of The Atheist Alliance Web Center.


DID YOU KNOW?

(The following e-mail entitled "Did You Know?" has been making the rounds as an attempt to point out that religious symbols and references are common in U.S. capital buildings and the words of America's founders, and thus they demonstrate a government endorsement of Judeo-Christian tradition. This, however, is false, as you can see from the following evidence associated with these claims, which was collected from Snopes.com on the Internet.Thanks to Steve Yothment, Peachtree City, GA, for pointing us to this Website. The next time you receive this offensive and misleading message, send back the following responses.)

DID YOU KNOW?

As you walk up the steps to the Capitol Building which houses the Supreme Court you can see near the top of the building a row of the world's law givers and each one is facing one in the middle who is facing forward with a full frontal view--it is Moses and the Ten Commandments!

Response:

The United States Capitol does not house the Supreme Court of the United States. The Supreme Court has met in its own building since 1935.

The two representations of Moses which adorn the Supreme Court building both present him in a context in which he is depicted as merely one of several historical exemplars of lawgivers, not as a religious figure. (This is why, for example, the Supreme Court of the United States rejected appeals to overturn a decision ordering the removal of a monument to the Ten Commandments from an Alabama courthouse--the monument did not present the Ten Commandments in a context other than as quotations of Biblical verse and was therefore deemed an unconstitutional state endorsement of religion.)

The depiction referred to here is a sculpture entitled "Justice the Guardian of Liberty" by Hermon A. McNeil, which appears on the eastern pediment of the Supreme Court building. (The eastern pediment is the back of the Supreme Court building, and so this sculpture is not something one would see "walking up the steps to the building which houses the Supreme Court." The front entrance is on the western side.)

The sculpture was intended to be a symbolic representation of three of the Eastern civilizations from which our laws were derived, personified by the figures of three great lawgivers: Moses, Confucius and Solon (surrounded by several allegorical figures representing a variety of legal themes).

McNeil described the symbolism of his work thusly: Law as an element of civilization was normally and naturally derived or inherited in this country from former civilizations. The "Eastern Pediment" of the Supreme Court Building suggests therefore the treatment of such fundamental laws and precepts as are derived from the East. Moses, Confucius and Solon are chosen as representing three great civilizations and form the central group of this Pediment.

Note also that the two other lawgiver figures (Confucius and Solon) are not "facing [the] one in the middle" (i.e., Moses) as claimed here--all three of the lawgivers are depicted in full frontal views, facing forward. (The allegorical figures who flank the lawgivers are facing towards the middle, but they are looking in the direction of all three men, not just Moses.) And although many viewers might assume Moses is holding a copy of the Ten Commandments in this depiction, the two tablets in his arms are actually blank.

DID YOU KNOW?

As you enter the Supreme Court courtroom, the two huge oak doors have the Ten Commandments engraved on each lower portion of each door.

Response:

The doors of the Supreme Court courtroom don't literally have the "Ten Commandments engraved on each lower portion"--the lower portions of the two doors are engraved with a symbolic depiction, two tablets bearing only the Roman numerals I through V and VI through X. As discussed next, these symbols can represent something other than the Ten Commandments.

DID YOU KNOW?

As you sit inside the courtroom, you can see the wall right above where the Supreme Court judges sit a display of the Ten Commandments!

Response:

The wall "right above where the Supreme Court judges sit" is the east wall, on which is displayed a frieze designed by sculptor Adolph A. Weinman. The frieze features two male figures who represent the Majesty of Law and the Power of Government, flanked on the left side by a group of figures representing Wisdom, and on the right side by a group of figures representing Justice.

According to Weinman, the designer of this frieze, the tablet visible between the two central male figures, engraved with the Roman numerals I through X, represents not the Ten Commandments, but the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution, collectively known as the "Bill of Rights."

The friezes which adorn the north and south walls of the courtroom in the Supreme Court building (also designed by Weinman) depict a procession of 18 great lawgivers: Menes, Hammurabi, Moses, Solomon, Lycurgus, Solon, Draco, Confucius and Octavian (south wall); Justinian, Mohammed, Charlemagne, King John, Louis IX, Hugo Grotius, Sir William Blackstone, John Marshall and Napoleon (north wall).

According to the Office of the Curator of the Supreme Court of the United States, these figures were selected as a representation of secular law: Weinman's training emphasized a correlation between the sculptural subject and the function of the building and, because of this, [architect Cass] Gilbert relied on him to choose the subjects and figures that best reflected the function of the Supreme Court building.

Faithful to classical sources, Weinman designed for the
Courtroom friezes a procession of "great lawgivers of history," from many civilizations, to portray the development of secular law.

Note that Moses is not given any special emphasis in this depiction: his figure is not larger than the others, nor does it appear in a dominant position. Also, the writing on the tablet carried by Moses in this frieze includes portions of commandments 6 through 10 (in Hebrew), specifically chosen because they are not inherently religious. (Commandments 6 through 10 proscribe murder, adultery, theft, perjury, and covetousness.)

DID YOU KNOW?

There are Bible verses etched in stone all over the Federal Buildings and Monuments in Washington, D.C.

Response:

This one is true, but likewise there are federal buildings and monuments all over the city that do not contain Bible verses.

DID YOU KNOW?

James Madison, the fourth president, known as "The Father of Our Constitution" made the following statement: "We have staked the whole of all our political institutions upon the capacity of mankind for self-government, upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God."

Response:

Actually, this statement appears nowhere in the writings or recorded utterances of James Madison and is completely contradictory to his character as a strong proponent of the separation of church and state.

DID YOU KNOW?

Patrick Henry, that patriot and Founding Father of our country said, "It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded not by religionists but by Christians ... not on religions but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ."

Response:

Another spurious quotation. These words appear nowhere in the writings or recorded utterances of Patrick Henry. However, President John Adams, signing the 1797 Treaty between the U.S. and Tripoli, did write, "As the government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion ..." which negates this claim.

DID YOU KNOW?

Every session of Congress begins with a prayer by a paid preacher ... whose salary has been paid by the taxpayer since 1777.

Response:

Congress has indeed retained paid (Christian) chaplains since 1789 (not 1777) to open sessions with prayer and to provide spiritual guidance to members and their staffs upon request. This practice was strongly opposed by James Madison at its inception.

The constitutional propriety of Congressional chaplains has been challenged in an August 2002 lawsuit filed in federal district court by Michael A. Newdow (the California man who won a federal appellate court decision against the use of the phrase "under God" in public school-led recitations of the Pledge of Allegiance). The case is still pending.

DID YOU KNOW?

Fifty-two of the 55 founders of the Constitution were members of the established orthodox churches in the colonies.

Response:

The diverse beliefs and religiosity of America's founding fathers is a complex subject, one which cannot be so neatly encapsulated by an (inadequately substantiated) statement such as the one quoted above. (See, for example, this critique of the above-quoted statement and similar material in Snopes.com on the Internet.)

DID YOU KNOW?

Thomas Jefferson worried that the Courts would overstep their authority and instead of interpreting the law would begin making law ... an oligarchy ... the rule of few over many....

Response:

Yes, Thomas Jefferson was concerned about courts overstepping their authority and making (rather than interpreting) law, as was James Madison, who said, "As the courts are generally the last in making the decision, it results to them, by refusing or not refusing to execute a law, to stamp it with its final character. This makes the Judiciary department paramount in fact to the Legislature, which was never intended, and can never be proper."

However, this issue really has nothing to do with the subject at hand (the endorsement of Judeo-Christian tradition by the federal government), other than in the tangential sense that some people feel one of the areas in which U.S. courts have overstepped their bounds is the body of decisions prohibiting the use or display of religious symbols and references in state-operated institutions.

DID YOU KNOW?

The very first Supreme Court Justice, John Jay, said: "Americans should select and prefer Christians as their rulers."

Response:

John Jay, one of the framers of the Constitution, was appointed by George Washington in 1789 to be the first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States (and later served two terms as governor of New York). He wrote, in a private letter (1797) to clergyman Jedidiah Morse: "Providence has given to our people the choice of their rulers, and it is the duty, as well as the privilege and interest of our Christian nation to select and prefer Christians for their rulers.

"It is to be regretted, but so I believe the fact to be, that except the Bible there is not a true history in the world. Whatever may be the virtue, discernment, and industry of the writers, I am persuaded that truth and error (though in different degrees) will imperceptibly become and remain mixed and blended until they shall be separated forever by the great and last refining fire."

THE E-MAIL CONTINUES...

How, then, have we gotten to the point that everything we have done for 220 years in this country is now suddenly wrong and unconstitutional?

Please forward this to everyone you can. Lets [sic] put it around the world and let the world see and remember what this great country was built on. Thank you!!

I was asked to send this on if I agreed or delete if I didn't. Now it is your turn.... It is said that 86% of Americans believe in God. Therefore I have a very hard time understanding why there is such a mess about having the 10 commandments on display or "In God We Trust" on our money and having God in the Pledge of Allegiance.

Response:

By your own figures, then 14% of Americans do not believe in God. Therefore, I have a hard time understanding why Christians are so rabid about flying their religion in the face of non-Christians, especially since the Bill of Rights (Amendments I-X of the U.S. Constitution, remember?) were passed "to clarify certain individual ... rights not named in the Constitution," and the very first one begins, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion ..." which is exactly what proselytizing Christians would love to have, but only so long as Christianity is the established religion.

This file is presented courtesy of
The Atheist Alliance Web Center:
http://www.atheistalliance.org.

For more information:
Email info@atheistalliance.org.
 

This page was last updated 08/21/09 04:43 PM.

Thanks for visiting. Please bookmark No Bull and come back often.


 

.

Copyright 2005, 2008, 2009 Bill Dearmore. Permission is granted to republish most (but not all) articles from the No Bull Website with appropriate citation. Please see our Copyright Page for details and be sure to read our General Information Page.


Home | Bible Contradictions | Dictionary | Einstein | Evolution | FAQ | From the Net | From Readers | Giggles | Home Page Archive | How Old Is Earth? | Is Science Just Another Religion? | Links | Questions for God | Religion: What Others Say  | Saved | Skepticism or Cynicism? | Terms | Scientific Method | Things I'm Skeptical Of | To Save a Mockingbird | What Can I Believe? | Update Archive | What Does a Believer Lose? | Who is Bill Dearmore?